NOTE: Not gonna publish some of my best bugs :) Sorry !!!
Well, it was a amazing Sunday ( We are a Startup ). I reached my office approximately at 10:30AM and had my colleague with me in office. He had a long night journey that day, so he decided to have a 5 hour nap in our office :)
I was reviewing my previously reported bugs in Google VRP and I was listening to a song on YouTube.
When I was listening to the song, I noticed the share function in YouTube that I never used before.
The Share function has more options like “Share to Facebook”, “Share to Twitter”, “Share to Email” and more. And this time Embed option got my attention.
The Embed option allows user to embed a YouTube Video in their site in a iframe by a small HTML code like below:
Well, everything was fine until I decided to embed a video in my own site. So, I copied the code and pasted it in my own site. I refreshed my site and found the YouTube video embedded in my site.
And when before playing the video I found the YouTube Video had the Channel Image. And hovering the mouse above the Image allowed users to directly Subscribe or Unsubscribe to a channel without sending the user to the main channel page to confirm the Subscription. Hmmmm ;)
I was wondering if I can convert this to a potential Clickjacking attack that allows an attacker to trick a victim to Subscribe or Unsubscribe to a channel then it would be cool…
I jumped in to my Sublime Editor and started creating a small HTML code that can be convincing for a victim to go for it. And like in 5 minutes I came up with a toooo simple HTML code and built a POC. That works like this:
It was a very simple game ( Not a game though ) The victim has to hover his mouse over the RED color and has to follow the path and click on it when it turns to GREEN color. I agree this isn’t super cool POC script but with 5–10 mins of time…That was OK :)
And this also has a function to add a video to Watch Later that can be also used to add a video in Victim’s Watch later list by again creating a fake button.
Without any delays even before reporting this issue:
All I had in my mind was, what could be the Google VRP reply be ?
- Duplicate
- Intended Behavior
- Won’t Fix & more…
And I was also wondering how it didn’t get on the eyes of other top researchers which was just there. Like Literally there !!
I reported this to Google VRP and after two days I received a mail like this:
At first glace, this might not severe enough to qualify for a reward
I was almost broke but still it was Accepted and the panel will take a look.
And after around 2 weeks I received a mail like this:
Yes, the panel decided to reward me $100. I was literally laughing because I never thought this will be even rewarded and even my friend said “It was something, than nothing”
But still it wasn’t totally satisfying for me and asked them for a explanation and GVRP team replied me, that the reward was issued based on the impact and also we found unusual user interaction on this scenario, which I also seriously agree. And also added me that if I can and decrease the user interaction, we will reconsider this issue again.
And on Feb 2, 2021
Started working on this and it’s been almost 2 months and decided to give up :(
yah, but still I am happy with the panel decision:
Need a Video for better understanding — Here you go:
Thanks for reading:
Well if you love this write up drop a clap 👏, let’s connect then:
Twitter: sriramoffcl
Instagram: sriram_offcl
LinkedIn: sriramkesavan
Peace ✌️ !!!