AI Is Not the Villain (or the Hero)
嗯,用户让我总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”之类的开头。好的,首先我需要仔细阅读这篇文章,理解它的主要观点。 文章讨论了AI对就业的影响,反驳了AI取代工作的常见说法。作者认为公司本来就想自己完成工作,只是因为无法实现才雇佣员工。AI只是给了他们工具,让公司更容易自动化。所以这不是AI的问题,而是公司长期以来的策略。 接下来,作者建议人们不要把矛头指向AI或公司,而是应该提升自己,建立个人品牌,在线展示技能,这样可以更平等地与公司合作或独立提供服务。长远来看,这将形成一个更人性化的工作模式。 所以总结的时候要涵盖这些点:AI只是工具,公司减少人力是长期趋势,建议个人提升自我能力。 现在控制在100字以内。可能需要简化一些细节,但要保留核心观点:AI让公司更容易自动化工作,减少人力是公司的长期目标,并建议个人发展独立能力。 最后检查一下字数和表达是否清晰。 </think> 文章指出AI并非取代工作的罪魁祸首,而是给了企业实现长期目标的工具——减少人力依赖。企业本质上不愿雇佣员工,只是因为无法自行完成工作才不得不招聘。当技术(包括AI)能够替代时,企业自然会减少人力需求。作者建议人们应摆脱对企业的过度依赖,发展个人能力,建立独立的在线存在,以更平等的方式参与经济活动。 2026-4-27 22:30:0 Author: danielmiessler.com(查看原文) 阅读量:11 收藏

Companies always wanted to do the work themselves — AI just gave them the tools

April 27, 2026

A figure walks away from a cracking corporate tower toward humans connecting peer-to-peer

Hey all, I want to take a moment to clarify what I think is happening with jobs, AI, and tech in general right now.

The common narrative is that AI is the villain, and it's taking away our amazing corporate jobs. And that this is a huge mistake, because 1) we love our corporate jobs, and 2) AI isn't even good enough to replace a bad worker, let alone a good one.

Please allow me to to offer another perspective. A completely different frame, in the spirit of Deutschian "hard-to-vary" Explanation.

This push to remove human jobs pre-dates AI by...basically forever.

If founders/companies could do all the work themselves they would NEVER have hired a single employee. They don't hire them for fun, because they like people. Companies hire people because they absolutely MUST. Because there is no alternative. They hire when they can't do the work themselves, and there's no machine or automation that can do the work as good or better. It's a last resort, and not desirable.

The exact moment that changes, is the moment the jobs go away. This is not an AI thing. It has nothing to do with AI. This is a most-every-single-business-everywhere thing.

By framing things with AI at the center, we ignore this fundamental and gross reality about jobs, work, and business, and we're raising up a Strawman to attack. Anthropic, or OpenAI, or greedy business people, or whatever.

I think this is harmful rather than helpful.

I recommend we switch the "enemy" to the old way of thinking about work, where all work must be done through corporations. Because that relies 100% on companies not being able to do the work themselves, which is going away.

Instead lets build PEOPLE up! Let's help PEOPLE believe in their own capabilities. Let's help them create their own presences online to advertise their skills independently. As themselves.

Sure, they can then use that presence to get a corporate job if they want, but then it will be in a more equal type of exchange as opposed to them being "the worker" and the company having all the power.

And then, over time, it'll just be mostly people and their services, interacting with other people and their services. Like a human-to-human layer of connection (with some tech wiring it all up).

We have these corporate jobs, and they pay bills. I get that. So it's scary as hell to be losing them. But this is not some artificial disruption of business as usual: it's literally the same thing businesses and corporations have always done, which is trying to bring the labor in-house through automation.

The answer is not being mad at AI, or mad at corporations, for doing the exact thing they're there to do. The solution is to remake ourselves so that we don't need them for our livelihood. It's not healthy. It never has been.

We always needed to move away from it, and now we're being forced to, so let's try our best to figure out the new game and embrace it.

The transition will suck, but the other side will be far more human.

🫶🏼


文章来源: https://danielmiessler.com/blog/ai-is-not-the-villain?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=website
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh