Inventors of Quantum Cryptography Win Turing Award
好的,我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内。用户给的文章是关于Charles Bennett和Gilles Brassard获得2026图灵奖的,作者Bruce Schneier对量子密码学的看法。 首先,我得通读整篇文章,抓住主要信息。文章开头提到两位科学家获奖,接着Schneier表达了他的看法:他认为量子密码学虽然科学上很酷,但在商业上没有价值,解决不了实际的安全问题。他觉得现有的加密算法已经足够好,应该关注其他更严重的问题。 接下来,我需要把这些信息浓缩到100字以内。要包括获奖者、奖项、Schneier的观点、量子密码学的优缺点以及他的建议。 可能的结构是:获奖者和奖项,Schneier的观点,量子密码学的现状及其不足之处,以及他的建议关注其他安全问题。 要注意用词简洁,避免重复。例如,“虽然科学上有趣”可以概括为“科学上虽有趣”。同时,要确保信息准确无误。 最后检查字数是否在限制内,并调整句子结构以达到流畅和简洁。 </think> Charles Bennett 和 Gilles Brassard 获得 2026 年图灵奖,因其发明量子密码学。Bruce Schneier 认为该技术科学上虽有趣但在商业上无价值,无法解决实际安全问题。现有加密算法已足够强健,应优先关注其他更紧迫的安全威胁。 2026-3-31 11:5:32 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:1 收藏

Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard have won the 2026 Turing Award for inventing quantum cryptography.

I am incredibly pleased to see them get this recognition. I have always thought the technology to be fantastic, even though I think it’s largely unnecessary. I wrote up my thoughts back in 2008, in an <a href+https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2008/10/quantum_cryptography.html”>essay titled “Quantum Cryptography: As Awesome As It Is Pointless.”

Back then, I wrote:

While I like the science of quantum cryptography—my undergraduate degree was in physics—I don’t see any commercial value in it. I don’t believe it solves any security problem that needs solving. I don’t believe that it’s worth paying for, and I can’t imagine anyone but a few technophiles buying and deploying it. Systems that use it don’t magically become unbreakable, because the quantum part doesn’t address the weak points of the system.

Security is a chain; it’s as strong as the weakest link. Mathematical cryptography, as bad as it sometimes is, is the strongest link in most security chains. Our symmetric and public-key algorithms are pretty good, even though they’re not based on much rigorous mathematical theory. The real problems are elsewhere: computer security, network security, user interface and so on.

Cryptography is the one area of security that we can get right. We already have good encryption algorithms, good authentication algorithms and good key-agreement protocols. Maybe quantum cryptography can make that link stronger, but why would anyone bother? There are far more serious security problems to worry about, and it makes much more sense to spend effort securing those.

As I’ve often said, it’s like defending yourself against an approaching attacker by putting a huge stake in the ground. It’s useless to argue about whether the stake should be 50 feet tall or 100 feet tall, because either way, the attacker is going to go around it. Even quantum cryptography doesn’t “solve” all of cryptography: The keys are exchanged with photons, but a conventional mathematical algorithm takes over for the actual encryption.

What about quantum computation? I’m not worried; the math is ahead of the physics. Reports of progress in that area are overblown. And if there’s a security crisis because of a quantum computation breakthrough, it’s because our systems aren’t crypto-agile.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Schneier on Security authored by Bruce Schneier. Read the original post at: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/03/inventors-of-quantum-cryptography-win-turing-award.html


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2026/03/inventors-of-quantum-cryptography-win-turing-award/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh