Proton Mail Shared User Information with the Police
好的，我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100个字以内。用户提供的文章看起来主要是评论和讨论，特别是关于Proton的回应。首先，我需要仔细阅读这些评论，找出主要观点。 评论中提到Proton在反驳文章中指出，任何公司都必须遵守法律命令。Proton采取措施不保留用户数据，因此当局无法获取用户内容。此外，用户可以选择用现金、加密货币或信用卡支付。如果用户需要匿名，使用现金或加密货币是更好的选择。作者对这些限制感到满意，并认为这比Google好得多。 接下来，我需要将这些信息浓缩成一句话，不超过100个字。重点包括：Proton的回应、遵守法律、不保留数据、支付方式以及匿名选项。 可能的结构是：Proton回应称公司必须遵守法律，不保留数据以防止当局获取，用户可选现金、加密货币或信用卡支付以确保匿名。 检查字数是否在限制内，并确保信息准确传达。 </think> Proton回应称公司必须遵守法律要求，通过不保留用户数据避免当局获取内容，并提供现金、加密货币或信用卡支付方式以确保匿名性。 2026-3-20 11:2:23 Author: www.schneier.com(查看原文) 阅读量:30 收藏

Comments

Doug • March 20, 2026 7:36 AM

Proton had a nice rebuttal to the article. The TL;DR is that any company has to comply with legal orders. Proton takes care to not keep data so no user content is available to the authorities. The users have an option to pay with cash or crypto or credit card. If the user needed/wanted anonymity, then cash/crypto is the way to go. I’m comfortable with these constraints and it’s a quantum improvement over google.

Doug • March 20, 2026 7:37 AM

Proton had a nice rebuttal to the article. The TL;DR is that any company has to comply with legal orders. Proton takes care to not keep data so no user content is available to the authorities. The users have an option to pay with cash or crypto or credit card. If the user needed/wanted anonymity, then cash/crypto is the way to go. I’m comfortable with these constraints and it’s a quantum improvement over google.

Atom Feed Subscribe to comments on this entry

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.


文章来源: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/03/proton-mail-shared-user-information-with-the-police.html
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh