Why I Hate Anthropic and You Should Too
好的,我现在要帮用户总结这篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内。首先,我需要仔细阅读文章,理解其主要内容和情感基调。 文章主要讲的是一个叫Anthropic的公司,他们推出了一种新的订阅模式,用户一开始很喜欢。但后来发现这对公司来说不是一个好生意,除非他们能推动用户使用Claude Code。而且他们没有把这一点解释清楚。接着,他们阻止了用户绕过订阅直接使用API定价在其他产品中,理由是这对他们的业务不可持续。作者对此非常不满,认为Anthropic的做法很糟糕。 作者还提到Anthropic的CEO Dario在媒体上的表现不佳,比如不与记者对视,说话很快,给人留下不好的印象。同时,作者指出Anthropic虽然在AI安全方面有很多言论,并且在国际场合上表达了对中国获取先进AI技术的担忧,甚至拒绝了军方的合作请求。这些行为让他们显得道德立场坚定。 然而,作者认为这些行为导致了公司业务上的问题,比如API价格较高,订阅模式让用户感到不便。与其他AI公司的领导者相比,Dario显得不够专业和讨喜。作者最后表达了对Anthropic的不满,并认为读者也应该讨厌他们。 总结起来,文章的核心在于Anthropic在追求道德原则的同时忽视了用户体验和商业利益的平衡。他们的做法导致了用户的不满和业务上的困境。 现在我需要将这些内容浓缩到100字以内,并且不使用“文章内容总结”之类的开头语句。 首先确定关键点: 1. Anthropic推出新订阅模式。 2. 用户起初喜欢。 3. 该模式对业务不利。 4. 公司阻止绕过订阅的行为。 5. 作者认为公司行为糟糕。 6. 公司在AI安全方面有道德立场。 7. CEO表现不佳。 8. 与其他公司相比缺乏吸引力。 9. 用户不满价格和服务限制。 现在把这些点整合成流畅的句子: “文章描述了Anthropic因推出新订阅模式引发争议的情况。用户起初喜爱该模式,但其对业务不利且限制使用,引发不满。尽管公司在AI安全方面有道德立场,但CEO表现不佳及与其他公司相比缺乏吸引力,导致用户批评。” 这样大约是96个字左右,符合要求。 </think> 文章描述了Anthropic因推出新订阅模式引发争议的情况。用户起初喜爱该模式,但其对业务不利且限制使用,引发不满。尽管公司在AI安全方面有道德立场,但CEO表现不佳及与其他公司相比缺乏吸引力,导致用户批评。 2026-2-23 22:45:0 Author: danielmiessler.com(查看原文) 阅读量:4 收藏

It's not about what a company does, but how it affects your token budget

February 23, 2026

Why I Hate Anthropic and You Should Too

All the best influencers hate Anthropic right now, and for good reason.

They ruined everything, and they're worthy of every bit of hate they get.

Quick recap:

  • They came out with this new subscription model
  • People absolutely loved it
  • But it's a really bad business deal for them unless they're getting people to use Claude Code
  • And they didn't make this clear enough!
  • Then they pushed back on people who were just using the subscription bypass to API pricing in other products
  • Supposedly because "it's not sustainable for Anthropic as a business" if they didn't stop the bypass.

Like I said, deplorable.

And have you even seen Dario speak with reporters?

Like, he doesn't make eye contact, and he talks really fast.

I don't know. I just don't like him.

It's an absolute disgrace.

There's a bunch of rabid fanboys probably taking money from them, though, who ask dumb questions like this.

Hey, but wait a minute.

Isn't Anthropic the company that has been talking the most about AI safety and preparing people for what is coming since their start?

Aren't they the ones who just said in Davos that it's fucking stupid to be giving the best models and the best AI chips to China when no one else has the courage to say that?

Didn't they just push back on the Pentagon for using their tools as weaponry?

Aren't they risking billions upon billions of dollars in contracts and potentially their company by doing this?

Like I told you, it's super dumb.

Sure, they seem to be the most morally principled of the labs, and have been far more willing to show mistakes and sound the alarm on how disruptive AI is going to be.

But have you seen the other AI leaders talk? They're very smooth and good-looking, and they can make eye contact, and they're smiling all the time. Super pro. Very likeable.

And their models are way cheaper! Like half as expensive!

All Dario does is prattle on about how "You have to get ready for what's coming!", and, "Here's what we're doing to make this transition easier for humans.", and, "Hey government, you can't use our stuff for gross shit."

Nerdy, boring, and not cool-sounding.

And they're fucking with my MAX subscription?

And they have higher API prices?

Fuck them and their "trying to help the world survive AI" mission. I'm not Gandhi; I'm trying to build a SaaS app (URL below btw).

I want Anthropic's product at other companies' prices, and I want to be able to use it how I want to use it.

Anthropic owes me that.

So that's why I hate them and you should too.


文章来源: https://danielmiessler.com/blog/why-you-should-hate-anthropic?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=website
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh