The cybersecurity landscape of 2026 is stronger than ever with countless security resources and protective tools. Despite robust defenses at anyone’s fingertips, common phishing scams and spoofing attacks remain an ongoing issue. Unfortunately, the reality is that these attacks aren’t disappearing; they’re simply evolving.
While we cannot surely predict the future statistics of these types of attacks, data from the past five years showcases similar trends, despite advances in security technologies. In 2025, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) reported that phishing emails are associated with more than 90% of successful cyberattacks. Even though overall numbers of phishing attacks have slightly decreased, their effectiveness in terms of monetary assets stolen has increased [PDF]. But why is this the case? Why are these tactics still effective even with elevated defenses?
Phishing is a multifaceted cybercrime that has evolved extensively. Attackers are constantly advancing their techniques with any means available, resulting in more targeted and stealthier intrusions. There is no solid indicator on what ensures that a phishing attack will be successful. However, a variety of tactics all revolve around the same common avenue: the human element.
In her Threat Vector feature, Palo Alto Networks Consultant Sama Manchanda details how attackers use psychological theories to ensure maximum effectiveness when targeting their potential victims. There are three main stages:
These stages provide the blueprint of how attackers exploit human emotions in order to bypass defenses. The most effective attacks also employ social engineering tactics. Unit 42 has observed three prevalent techniques:
These tactics demonstrate how attackers have mastered the psychological triggers required to manipulate users into surrendering assets. They also serve as a stark reminder that technology alone cannot prevent these attacks. True security requires a shift in personal mindset and proactive commitment to digital vigilance.
Outside of an attacker’s toolkit, certain inherent human traits can actually increase a person’s vulnerability. In her Threat Vector feature, Lisa Plaggemier, Executive Director of the National Cyber Security Alliance, discusses how overconfidence and the “illusion of control” create dangerous blind spots.
After surveying individuals across the globe, Plaggemier discovered an alarming trend: a vast majority of individuals rated their phishing detection skills as nearly perfect. This universal tendency to overestimate one's expertise is exactly what attackers take advantage of. When confidence exceeds actual competence, the risk of a breach increases exponentially.
Plaggemier’s studies highlight how individuals prioritize their own intuition instead of trusting in proven security protocols. By overvaluing personal habits, users internally diminish the worth of reliable technical controls. This confidence poses a significant risk because it can override a person’s intellectual knowledge by prompting them to ignore logic in favor of self-validation. It furthers the "contrarian mindset” where humans tend to reject educational messages that contradict their belief in their own abilities. Instead of learning or adapting to real-time situations, they adopt a defensive stance. This reaction creates a dangerous cycle that reinforces bad habits and leaves room for compromises.
The advancement of AI has permanently altered the phishing landscape by erasing the misspelled words and awkward phrasing that once gave attackers away. This combined with the addition of deepfakes and voice mimicry has made it nearly impossible to distinguish a friend from a fraud through traditional means. As a result, these advancements raise the critical question on how individuals can truly stay protected.
The hard truth is that no one is ever 100% secure. The most persistent attackers will constantly find ways to innovate and adjust. Factors such as cognitive bias and the “illusion of control” tell us that we can accurately identify phishing attempts, but it’s clear that going strictly off intuition is a flawed approach. To survive the AI shift, we must stop relying on instinct and start relying on consistent efforts such as:
No matter how convincing a message appears or how urgent a request feels, stop and truly assess the situation. Taking a moment to verify the source before taking any sort of action can stop an attack in its tracks.
Security is a continuous journey rather than a final destination. By choosing to analyze the information given rather than succumbing to an attacker’s strategies, you transform yourself from a potential victim into an active defender of your digital life.