THRM 2026: Changing Security Training and Human Behavior
好的,我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章,控制在100字以内。首先,我得仔细阅读文章内容,理解其主要观点。 文章主要讨论了传统安全培训的不足之处。传统培训通常是一年一次的幻灯片演示,加上一个简短的测验和一些提醒,但这些方法往往无法应对员工在高压、分心和压力下的真实情况。因此,很多安全意识项目悄悄失败了。 接着,文章介绍了THRM 2026会议,强调重新思考安全培训的方式。他们提出,传统的假设是如果人们知道规则就会遵守,但实际上人们在压力下更依赖本能而不是培训内容。因此,THRM 2026倡导以情景为基础的训练,模拟真实的工作场景,让员工在实际情况下练习应对策略。 此外,文章还提到培训应关注员工的实际行为而非完成率,并通过适应性训练减少疲劳感。最终目标是将培训融入日常工作,提升员工的决策能力和文化氛围。 总结一下,文章的核心观点是传统安全培训不够有效,THRM 2026提出通过情景模拟和行为导向的方法来提升员工的实际应对能力,并改变组织的安全文化。 现在需要将这些要点浓缩到100字以内。要确保涵盖传统方法的问题、THRM 2026的新方法、情景训练的重要性以及行为导向的目标。 可能的结构:传统安全培训无效→THRM 2026提出新方法→情景模拟和行为准备→减少疲劳、提升决策→改变文化。 最后检查字数是否符合要求,并确保语言简洁明了。 </think> 传统安全培训因形式单一、脱离实际而效果不佳。THRM 2026会议提出以情景模拟和行为准备为核心的新方法,帮助员工在高压情境下做出正确决策。通过适应性训练减少疲劳感,并将培训融入日常工作,提升员工决策能力与组织文化。 2026-1-29 13:22:8 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

Most employees don’t ignore security training because they don’t care. They ignore it because it doesn’t feel real. A slide deck once a year. A short quiz at the end. A reminder to “stay vigilant.” These formats are familiar, easy to roll out, and easy to measure. They are also poorly suited for the moments that actually matter. No one gets compromised during a training session. They get compromised on a Tuesday afternoon when they’re busy, distracted, and under pressure. This disconnect is where many awareness programs quietly fail. And it’s why THRM 2026, the Threatcop Human Risk Management Conference, is pushing organizations to rethink how security training really works.

The Assumption That Keeps Breaking

Traditional security training is built on a simple assumption: if people know the rules, they’ll follow them. In the real world, that assumption rarely holds. People don’t fall for attacks because they forgot the policy. They fall for them because the situation feels legitimate in the moment.

Think about the conditions most successful attacks create:

  • Urgency that demands quick action
  • Familiar names or internal references
  • Context that feels routine and safe

Under pressure, instinct wins. Training fades into the background. THRM 2026 starts by acknowledging this reality instead of fighting it.

Awareness Does Not Equal Readiness

Awareness tells people what threats exist. Readiness prepares them for decisions under pressure. That difference matters.

Most awareness programs are passive. They deliver information and hope for behavior changes later. Readiness-focused programs do the opposite. They expose people to realistic scenarios so they can practice responses before it counts.

THRM 2026 centers on this shift.

The goal is not to make employees security experts. It’s to help them recognize patterns, slow down when something feels urgent, and escalate concerns sooner.

Why Realistic Practice Changes Behavior

There’s a reason pilots train in simulators and not just classrooms. Practice builds familiarity. Repetition builds confidence. When employees experience realistic attack scenarios, something important happens. They stop seeing threats as abstract concepts and start recognizing them as situations they’ve already encountered.

THRM 2026 explores training models that treat security like a skill, not a rulebook, including:

  • Scenario-based exercises tied to real job roles
  • Simulations that reflect how attacks unfold across channels
  • Learning formats that encourage participation instead of compliance

When training feels closer to real work, people take it more seriously.

Why Engagement Matters More Than Completion

Most training programs measure success by completion rates. That metric is convenient. It’s also misleading. An employee can complete training and still freeze under pressure. They can pass a quiz and still trust the wrong signal when time is short.

THRM 2026 encourages security leaders to look beyond completion and ask better questions:

  • Do people recognize risky patterns faster
  • Do they pause when urgency is high
  • Do they report concerns earlier

These behaviors matter far more than whether someone clicked “Next” on a slide.

People working on cybersecurity

Training Without Fatigue

One of the biggest complaints about security training is fatigue. Too frequent, too repetitive, too disconnected from daily work. THRM 2026 addresses this head-on by reframing training as something that adapts rather than repeats. When training is informed by real behavior and exposure, it becomes more relevant and less intrusive. Employees don’t feel lectured. They feel supported.

This reduces resentment and increases engagement, which is something most organizations struggle to achieve with traditional awareness programs.

Why This Matters to CISOs

Human behavior directly affects breach likelihood, response speed, and impact. When incidents originate through social engineering, the difference between early reporting and delayed response can mean the difference between containment and escalation.

THRM 2026 helps CISOs connect training outcomes to real risk reduction by focusing on:

  • Behavior under pressure, not just knowledge retention
  • Early escalation instead of silent failure
  • Confidence instead of compliance

This is where training becomes a security control, not a checkbox.



Cyber Security Squad – Newsletter Signup

Join our weekly newsletter and stay updated

What Security Leaders Take Back From THRM 2026?

THRM 2026 isn’t about making training more entertaining. It’s about making it effective. Security leaders leave with clarity on how to:

  • Move away from checkbox awareness programs
  • Align training with observed human risk
  • Build resilience without overwhelming employees

Training becomes part of how people work, not something they rush to finish. That shift changes culture quietly but meaningfully.

People Aren’t the Weakest Link

Calling people the weakest link has never helped. It ignores context, pressure, and how attacks are actually designed.

People are not weak. They are targeted.

THRM 2026 reframes training around this reality. The goal isn’t to eliminate mistakes. It’s to reduce the impact of inevitable human decisions by preparing people for actual situations.

The Takeaway

Security training fails when it treats humans like endpoints. It succeeds when it treats them like decision-makers. THRM 2026 is where organizations will get to know how to build human readiness instead of relying on reminders and rules. It’s where training evolves from passive awareness to active defense.

If your goal is security training that actually changes behavior and supports people when pressure is highest, this is where that shift begins.

The post THRM 2026: Changing Security Training and Human Behavior appeared first on Kratikal Blogs.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Kratikal Blogs authored by Shikha Dhingra. Read the original post at: https://kratikal.com/blog/thrm-2026-changing-security-training-and-human-behavior/


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2026/01/thrm-2026-changing-security-training-and-human-behavior/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh