When MFA Fails Quietly: Inside the Rise of AiTM Phishing Attacks
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要特定的开头。首先,我需要理解这篇文章的主要内容。 文章讲的是多因素认证(MFA)虽然被广泛认为是安全措施,但最近出现了一种新的网络钓鱼攻击方式,叫做Adversary-in-the-Middle(AiTM)。这种攻击方式绕过了MFA,通过实时劫持认证会话来获取访问权限。攻击者不是窃取凭证反复尝试登录,而是直接在合法的登录流程中拦截用户,捕获会话令牌并重复使用,这样就不会触发失败登录警告或MFA挑战。 接下来,文章解释了为什么这种攻击很难被发现。从技术上看,一切似乎正常:认证成功,会话有效,云服务接受令牌为合法。因此,传统的安全控制措施无法检测到这种攻击。一旦进入系统内部,攻击者会专注于持久化和扩展访问权限。 文章还提到Seceon的统一安全平台如何应对这种威胁。Seceon将认证视为分析的起点而不是终点,并持续关联身份活动与端点、云和网络行为。这使得他们能够检测到异常的会话行为、识别令牌复用模式、监控跨云服务的横向移动以及分析看似合法的访问路径。 最后,文章总结说AiTM钓鱼攻击之所以有效是因为它们利用了假设而非漏洞。组织需要意识到认证成功并不意味着信任结束,并且需要关注认证后的行为来识别潜在威胁。 现在我需要将这些要点浓缩到100字以内。要确保涵盖多因素认证被绕过、AiTM钓鱼攻击的特点、攻击难以检测的原因以及Seceon的解决方案。 可能的结构是:多因素认证被绕过;AiTM钓鱼攻击通过实时劫持会话;传统安全措施无法检测;Seceon通过持续分析行为来识别异常。 </think> 多因素认证常被视为安全终点,但新型Adversary-in-the-Middle(AiTM)钓鱼攻击通过实时劫持认证会话绕过MFA。攻击者在合法登录过程中捕获并复用会话令牌,使传统安全措施失效。Seceon通过持续分析身份活动与行为关联,早期识别异常行为和潜在威胁。 2026-1-28 18:35:7 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

Multi-factor authentication has long been treated as a security finish line. Once enabled, organizations assume that account takeover risks drop dramatically. Recent attacker behavior suggests otherwise.

New reporting details a growing wave of adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing campaigns that are specifically designed to bypass MFA by hijacking authentication sessions in real time, according to IT Pro.

Rather than stealing credentials and attempting repeated logins, these attacks intercept users during legitimate sign-in flows. Session tokens are captured instantly and reused, giving attackers authenticated access without triggering failed-login alerts or MFA challenges.

What makes this approach dangerous is not just its sophistication, but how normal it looks once access is established.

Why These Attacks Are Hard to Spot

From a technical standpoint, nothing appears broken. Authentication succeeds. Sessions are valid. Cloud services accept the tokens as legitimate. Security controls designed to detect brute force or credential stuffing never activate.

Once inside, attackers focus on persistence and expansion. Email access is often used to set inbox rules, harvest sensitive communications, or launch internal phishing campaigns that leverage trusted accounts. Over time, this access can extend to document repositories, administrative portals, and downstream systems.

In environments where identity telemetry is monitored separately from cloud activity or endpoint behavior, these signals rarely connect.

The Shift From Authentication to Behavior

AiTM campaigns reflect a broader evolution in attacker strategy. Rather than trying to defeat authentication controls, adversaries are adapting to them. Identity is no longer just an entry point. It has become the operating layer for long-term access.

This creates a blind spot for organizations that still treat login success as a proxy for trust. Without continuous analysis of how sessions are used after authentication, attackers can operate entirely within the boundaries of “approved” access.

Why Seceon’s Unified Platform Changes the Outcome

Seceon’s unified security platform approaches identity attacks differently by treating authentication as the beginning of analysis, not the end. Rather than relying solely on login success or MFA validation, Seceon continuously correlates identity activity with endpoint, cloud, and network behavior to understand how access is actually being used.

This enables:

  • Detection of abnormal session behavior following valid authentication
  • Identification of token reuse patterns that deviate from historical access behavior
  • Visibility into identity activity expanding laterally across cloud services
  • Contextual analysis of access paths that appear legitimate in isolation

By connecting post-authentication behavior across systems, Seceon helps surface AiTM-style attacks early, before compromised sessions can be used to establish persistence or escalate privileges. In identity-driven attacks where credentials are never technically compromised, behavioral context becomes the most reliable signal.

Final Thoughts

AiTM phishing is effective because it exploits assumptions, not vulnerabilities. As long as authentication is treated as a trust guarantee, attackers will continue to operate quietly inside legitimate access paths.

In modern environments, the real challenge is no longer stopping logins. It is recognizing when trusted access starts behaving like an intrusion.

Footer-for-Blogs-3

The post When MFA Fails Quietly: Inside the Rise of AiTM Phishing Attacks appeared first on Seceon Inc.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Seceon Inc authored by Kriti Tripathi. Read the original post at: https://seceon.com/when-mfa-fails-quietly-inside-the-rise-of-aitm-phishing-attacks/


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2026/01/when-mfa-fails-quietly-inside-the-rise-of-aitm-phishing-attacks/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh