google sesssion cookie stealing doesnt really work know
好的,我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,并且不需要特定的开头。首先,我得仔细阅读用户提供的文章内容。 这篇文章是关于会话处理和基于cookie的身份验证的安全测试。作者过去通过复制和导入cookie数据在不同账户之间复用会话,但现在这种方法不再有效了。他之前开发了一个工具来分析cookie中的会话标识符,研究会话失效、绑定和轮换机制。现在他想了解安全措施的变化,比如是否加强了会话绑定、设备指纹识别、令牌轮换、SameSite/HttpOnly标志或服务器端验证。 接下来,我需要提取关键点:会话处理、cookie认证、安全测试、过去能复用会话但现在不行、可能的安全机制变化。然后把这些信息浓缩成100字以内的描述。 要注意不要使用“文章内容总结”这样的开头,直接描述即可。同时要确保语言简洁明了,涵盖主要问题和作者的研究方向。 最后检查一下字数是否符合要求,确保信息准确无误。 </think> 作者探讨了基于Cookie的认证机制在防御性安全测试中的变化。过去通过复制Cookie数据复用会话的行为已失效,可能源于更严格的会话绑定、设备指纹识别、令牌轮换或SameSite/HttpOnly等安全措施的改进。 2026-1-28 16:3:39 Author: www.reddit.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

Hi everyone! I’ve been experimenting with session handling and cookie‑based authentication from a defensive/security testing standpoint. In the past, copying and importing cookie data (for example via browser tools or extensions) between accounts sometimes allowed a session to be reused. This behavior worked for a while, but no longer does.

Previously, I built a small tool to analyze session identifiers present in cookies for research purposes, mainly to understand how session invalidation, binding, and rotation were implemented. I’d typically export cookies in JSON format and observe how modern platforms handled them when environments or accounts changed.

Now that this approach no longer works, I’m trying to understand what changes were introduced on the security side—for example, whether it’s due to stricter session binding, device fingerprinting, token rotation, SameSite/HttpOnly flags, or server‑side validation improvements.

Does anyone have insight into which defensive mechanisms are now preventing session reuse, or what best practices platforms currently use to mitigate this class of issue? And also, if you know this thing can be bypassed, let me know.


文章来源: https://www.reddit.com/r/HowToHack/comments/1qpfe1c/google_sesssion_cookie_stealing_doesnt_really/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh