The Constitutionality of Geofence Warrants
好的,我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章,控制在100字以内。首先,我得仔细阅读文章内容,抓住主要信息。 文章讲的是美国最高法院正在考虑地方法令的合宪性。案件涉及一个叫Okello Chatrie的人,他因2019年抢劫案被判刑。警察通过Google的匿名位置数据锁定了他,进而查获了赃物。Chatrie上诉称这种地方法令侵犯了第四修正案的权利。 接下来,我需要将这些要点浓缩成一句话。要包括最高法院、地方法令、Chatrie的案件、警察使用Google数据、查获证据以及宪法挑战。 最后,确保语言简洁明了,不使用任何开头语,直接描述内容。 </think> 美国最高法院正在审议地方法令的合宪性问题。一名男子因2019年抢劫案被定罪后上诉,称警方通过Google获取匿名位置数据并锁定其身份的做法侵犯了第四修正案权利。 2026-1-27 12:1:47 Author: www.schneier.com(查看原文) 阅读量:5 收藏

The US Supreme Court is considering the constitutionality of geofence warrants.

The case centers on the trial of Okello Chatrie, a Virginia man who pleaded guilty to a 2019 robbery outside of Richmond and was sentenced to almost 12 years in prison for stealing $195,000 at gunpoint.

Police probing the crime found security camera footage showing a man on a cell phone near the credit union that was robbed and asked Google to produce anonymized location data near the robbery site so they could determine who committed the crime. They did so, providing police with subscriber data for three people, one of whom was Chatrie. Police then searched Chatrie’s home and allegedly surfaced a gun, almost $100,000 in cash and incriminating notes.

Chatrie’s appeal challenges the constitutionality of geofence warrants, arguing that they violate individuals’ Fourth Amendment rights protecting against unreasonable searches.

Tags: , ,

Posted on January 27, 2026 at 7:01 AM0 Comments

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.


文章来源: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/01/the-constitutionality-of-geofence-warrants.html
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh