Securing the AI Frontier: How API Posture Governance Enables NIST AI RMF Compliance
好的,我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章,控制在100字以内。首先,我得仔细阅读文章内容,抓住主要信息。 文章主要讲的是组织在加速采用人工智能时面临的风险管理问题。提到了NIST的AI风险管理框架(AI RMF 1.0),这是一个标准,用于设计、开发和部署可信的AI系统。接着,文章强调了API的重要性,因为AI系统依赖API来处理数据和通信。因此,API的安全性直接关系到AI系统的安全性。 文章还提到Salt Security提供了一个解决方案,帮助组织遵守NIST框架,并保护API层免受威胁。最后,结论部分指出,可信的AI需要安全的API,并建议通过实施API态势治理来实现这一点。 现在,我需要将这些要点浓缩到100字以内。要确保涵盖NIST框架、API的重要性、Salt Security的作用以及结论中的关键点。 可能的结构是:首先说明NIST框架的作用,然后提到API的风险和治理措施,最后点出Salt Security的作用。 这样组合起来应该能在字数限制内清晰传达主要内容。 </think> 随着组织加速采用人工智能技术(如大型语言模型和自主代理),风险管理已成为关键业务需求。NIST AI风险管理框架(AI RMF 1.0)成为管理这些风险的标准。由于AI系统依赖API进行数据处理和通信,API安全成为保障AI系统安全的核心。Salt Security通过自动化API发现、态势治理和威胁检测等技术手段,帮助组织实现与NIST框架的对齐,确保AI系统的可信性和合规性。 2025-12-16 13:0:2 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:8 收藏

As organizations accelerate the adoption of Artificial Intelligence, from deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrating autonomous agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, risk management has transitioned from a theoretical exercise to a critical business imperative. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has emerged as the standard for managing these risks, offering a structured approach to designing, developing, and deploying trustworthy AI systems.

However, AI systems do not operate in isolation. They rely heavily on Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to ingest training data, serve model inferences, and facilitate communication between agents and servers. Consequently, the API attack surface effectively becomes the AI attack surface. Securing these API pathways is fundamental to achieving the “Secure and Resilient” and “Privacy-Enhanced” characteristics mandated by the framework.

Understanding the NIST AI RMF Core

The NIST AI RMF is organized around four core functions that provide a structure for managing risk throughout the AI lifecycle:

  • GOVERN: Cultivates a culture of risk management and outlines processes, documents, and organizational schemes.
  • MAP: Establishes context to frame risks, identifying interdependencies and visibility gaps.
  • MEASURE: Employs tools and methodologies to analyze, assess, and monitor AI risk and related impacts.
  • MANAGE: Prioritizes and acts upon risks, allocating resources to respond to and recover from incidents.

The Critical Role of API Posture Governance

While the “GOVERN” function in the NIST framework focuses on organizational culture and policies, API Posture Governance serves as the technical enforcement mechanism for these policies in operational environments.

Without robust API posture governance, organizations struggle to effectively Manage or Govern their AI risks. Unvetted AI models may be deployed via shadow APIs, and sensitive training data can be exposed through misconfigurations. Automating posture governance ensures that every API connected to an AI system adheres to security standards, preventing the deployment of insecure models and ensuring your AI infrastructure remains compliant by design.

How Salt Security Safeguards AI Systems

Salt Security provides a tailored solution that aligns directly with the NIST AI RMF. By securing the API layer (Agentic AI Action Layer), Salt Security helps organizations maintain the integrity of their AI systems and safeguard sensitive data. The key features, along with their direct correlations to NIST AI RMF functions, include:

Automated API Discovery:

  • Alignment: Supports the MAP function by establishing context and recognizing risk visibility gaps.
  • Outcome: Guarantees a complete inventory of all APIs, including shadow APIs used for AI training or inference, ensuring no part of the AI ecosystem is unmanaged.

Posture Governance:

  • Alignment: Operationalizes the GOVERN and MANAGE functions by enabling organizational risk culture and prioritizing risk treatment.
  • Outcome: Preserves secure APIs throughout their lifecycle, enforcing policies that prevent the deployment of insecure models and ensuring ongoing compliance with NIST standards.

AI-Driven Threat Detection:

  • Alignment: Meets the Secure & Resilient trustworthiness characteristic by defending against adversarial misuse and exfiltration attacks.
  • Outcome: Actively identifies and blocks sophisticated threats like model extraction, data poisoning, and prompt injection attacks in real-time.

Sensitive Data Visibility:

  • Alignment: Supports the Privacy-Enhanced characteristic by safeguarding data confidentiality and limiting observation.
  • Outcome: Oversees data flow through APIs to protect PII and sensitive training data, ensuring data minimization and privacy compliance.

Vulnerability Assessment:

  • Alignment: Assists in the MEASURE function by assessing system trustworthiness and testing for failure modes.
  • Outcome: Identifies logic flaws and misconfigurations in AI-connected APIs before they can be exploited by adversaries.

Conclusion

Trustworthy AI requires secure APIs. By implementing API Posture Governance and comprehensive security controls, organizations can confidently adopt the NIST AI RMF and innovate safely. Salt Security provides the visibility and protection needed to secure the critical infrastructure powering your AI. For a more in-depth understanding of API security compliance across multiple regulations, please refer to our comprehensive API Compliance Whitepaper.

If you want to learn more about Salt and how we can help you, please contact us, schedule a demo, or visit our website. You can also get a free API Attack Surface Assessment from Salt Security’s research team and learn what attackers already know.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Salt Security blog authored by Eric Schwake. Read the original post at: https://salt.security/blog/securing-the-ai-frontier-how-api-posture-governance-enables-nist-ai-rmf-compliance


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/12/securing-the-ai-frontier-how-api-posture-governance-enables-nist-ai-rmf-compliance/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh