Quickpost: USB-C Rechargeable Batteries
文章介绍了带有USB-C接口的可充电AA和AAA电池。这些电池提供恒定1.5V电压,在放电时电压稳定。然而,实测容量远低于宣传值(AA为1527mAh vs 3400mAh)。优点包括高电压和无漏液风险;缺点则有容量不足、骤降电压及电子噪声。 2025-12-6 10:52:17 Author: blog.didierstevens.com(查看原文) 阅读量:9 收藏

I discovered USB-C rechargeable batteries, and bought a set of AA and AAA batteries.

They have a USB-C connector for recharging, so you don’t need a separate charger like you do for NiMH batteries.

This post is not a full blog post, but more a collection of lab notes.

These USB-C batteries deliver 1,5 Volt (unlike NiMH batteries that deliver 1,3 Volt). And during discharge tests, I noticed that the voltage almost doesn’t change. So not only must they have battery charger electronics inside, but also converter electronics that deliver a constant voltage. Probably something like a switching-mode power supply circuit, because when I look at the ripple of the voltage with an oscilloscope, I see a pattern that makes me think of a switching-mode power supply:

That’s for a AA battery that delivers power to an electronic load that draws 0,100 A current:

The ripple could also come from the electronic load itself, or some electronic noise source in my lab. So to rule that out, I discharged an alkaline battery and got this:

This is a different pattern and it repeats with a different frequency, to the ripple we saw in the first scope picture must come from the battery.

I also did measurements with a spectrum analyzer:

Here you can see a peak (and its harmonics) around 1,20 MHz.

That too comes from the battery, as these peaks do not appear with an alkaline battery:

In the picture of the electronic load screen, one can see 1493 mWh: that’s for the discharge of an AA battery at 0,100 A until the voltage reaches 0,5 V. 1493 is far less than the 3400 mWh printed in a large font on each battery.

I did a series of tests with my AA (0,100 A discharge current) and AAA (0,025 A discharge current) batteries, and on average I get:

TypeMeasured output (mWh)Advertized outputMeasured input (mWh)RTE
AA15273400211472%
AAA478120075463%

Unfortunately, these batteries deliver far less electrical energy than advertized.

For comparison, I also discharged an fresh alkaline AAA battery and got 1380 mWh out of it.

I created a discharge graph for a USB-C rechargeable AA battery:

During more than 9 hours, the voltage stays around 1,45 V (for a 0,100 A discharge current). Then it abruptly drops to 1,05 V, and then 0 V.

Charging the AA batteries requires 2114 mWh on average, the AAA batteries require 754 mWh. This is also far less than the advertized capacity. This allowed me to calculate the Round Trip Efficiency (RTE) in the table above.

Despite the discrepancy in capacity, these batteries have advantages too:

  • the nominal voltage is 1,5 Volt
  • the voltage curve remains (mostly) flat while discharging
  • their chemistry doesn’t result in battery leaks that corrode your electronics
  • you don’t need a battery charger

Disadvantages:

  • far less capacity than advertized
  • very abrupt voltage drop when fully discharged
  • they can’t negotiate power with a USB charger (you can’t charge them with a USB-C to USB-C cable, you must use a USB-A to USB-C cable like the one included)
  • some electronic noise because of the switching power supply

Quickpost info



文章来源: https://blog.didierstevens.com/2025/12/06/quickpost-usb-c-rechargeable-batteries/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh