The discovery of the Salt Typhoon hackers, accessing the cell data of U.S. political figures through at least ten telecommunications providers ahead of the 2024 election, marks a concerning evolution in nation-state cyber operations. This breach underscores the evolving tactics of state-sponsored cyber espionage, emphasizing the urgent need for enhanced cybersecurity measures and scrutiny of existing policy to safeguard sensitive communications and national security

While this breach garnered national attention by targeting President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and people connected to the Harris campaign to sow potential discord, it demonstrates greater vulnerabilities across the backbone of U.S. digital infrastructure. It also highlights concern about the potential theft and interception of cell records, messages, calls, and other valuable metadata for millions of Americans.

Salt Typhoon also highlights the need to review safeguards around the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). This incident underscores the critical need to reassess and strengthen the security measures mandated by CALEA to protect not only targeted individuals but the broader public. Enacted in 1994, CALEA requires telecommunications carriers to design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure they can implement lawful electronic surveillance. In other words, an incredibly high value target full of targeting data.

The growing challenge of telecom security

It’s believed that the breach exploited a particularly sensitive area of telecommunications infrastructure; the CALEA enabled channels between telecom providers and government agencies used for lawful surveillance and wiretaps.

This point of entry represents a critical vulnerability that has received surprisingly little public attention. This could be due to lack of information due to ongoing investigations, lack of visible public impact including the broader nature of the data, or a general public fatigue of seeing yet another high-profile data breach.

As long as CALEA exists your communications metadata are archived and likely unencrypted, especially data at rest. SMS messaging and call audio files would need to be captured in real time, something Salt Typhoon used their privileged access to exploit.  

Scale and complexity: the defender's dilemma

The sheer scale of modern telecom infrastructure creates unprecedented security challenges. Major providers like Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T and others maintain massive digital footprints for their website subdomains, cell and ISP networks. This complex and expansive attack surface comprised of hundreds of thousands of Application Programming Interface (APIs), and often-aging networking equipment makes comprehensive security monitoring and protection extraordinarily difficult, even with significant investment.

Likewise, the complexity of these networks with numerous access points, ingress/egress connections, and areas for an adversary to entrench themselves make incident response and hunt operations a daunting task. These factors combined with the critical role as being the backbone of the U.S. national digital infrastructure, makes them particularly attractive targets for sophisticated threat actors.

Implications for national security

The implications of this breach extend far beyond individual privacy concerns or momentary headlines of high-profile politicians being targeted. If attackers maintain access to telecom systems (through law enforcement surveillance interfaces or otherwise), they could not only read traffic and intercept messages, they could potentially disrupt broader ISP services which could have cascading implications to everyday American life.

The broader security risks are even more concerning. If the attackers could decrypt data, they could also access vast amounts of sensitive information. This suggests potential systemic vulnerabilities in telecom infrastructure that could pose national security threats.

Looking ahead: strengthening digital infrastructure

In light of this attack, there are five key areas the telecom and ISP industry needs to focus on to strengthen security:

1. Review Government-Telecom Interfaces:The potential exploitation of law enforcement surveillance channels shows that these processes must now be reevaluated, strengthened, and secured to mitigate exploitation from nation-states and other adversaries. Critical telecom infrastructure components should be segmented from general networks, while designing enhanced monitoring systems specifically for inter-carrier connections. Subscriber data access points must also receive special attention, with additional security layers added to protect sensitive customer information from unauthorized access or exfiltration.
2. Strengthen Infrastructure Monitoring:The telecom and ISP industry needs to develop better visibility across vast telecom networks while maintaining service reliability. Organizations should continuously document their network infrastructure and regularly update network maps and asset inventories (especially APIs). This practice must extend beyond simple documentation to include active monitoring for deviations from established baselines, helping to quickly identify potential security incidents. While incredibly challenging for large ISPs, they should strive to maintain detailed records of all external-facing assets, the interdependency of API connections and conduct regular audits of third-party connections, ensuring each entry point is properly secured, being used as intended, and monitored for deviations from baselines.
3. Improve Public-Private Collaboration: Telecom security requires coordination across multiple organizations and agencies. Providers should actively participate in information sharing programs, supporting and benefiting from shared threat intelligence. Joint security exercises help identify systemic vulnerabilities across digital infrastructure and improve coordinated response capabilities to inbound threats. Regular coordination between telecom providers also ensures that security measures remain effective across interconnected networks and systems.
4. Focus on Supply Chain Security: The interconnected nature of telecom infrastructure demands robust supply chain security measures. It is essential to examine third-party relationships and access points that could introduce vulnerabilities. Organizations must regularly and formally evaluate vendor security practices and maintain clear security requirements for all third-party providers. Continuous monitoring of supplier access and activities helps identify potential security risks before they can be exploited. Conducting regular audits of supply chain dependencies also ensures that all connections to external systems maintain appropriate security controls.
5. Enhance Authentication Controls: With other breaches exploiting authentication systems, telecom organizations must also implement rigorous access controls across their infrastructure. This extends beyond having simple password policies to require multi-factor authentication systems for all access points. Regular audits of access credentials and permissions help ensure that only authorized personnel maintain access to sensitive systems. Physical security controls for ID management must also integrate with digital authentication systems to create a cohesive security framework. Zero-trust architecture principles should guide all authentication decisions, treating all access attempts as potentially suspicious regardless of origin.

This breach serves as a wake-up call for the global telecom industry and government agencies alike. It highlights the critical need to balance operational requirements with robust security measures for an increasingly targeted sector and within an incredibly complex topology.

The full scope of this breach may not be known for some time, as investigators continue to analyze the extent of access, lateral movement, and potential data exposure implications. However, it already stands as a significant warning about the vulnerabilities within telecom and U.S. digital infrastructure and the growing sophistication of nation-state cyber operations. The industry must answer this call to improve security before it’s too late.

The views expressed in this article belong solely to the author and do not represent The Fast Mode. While information provided in this post is obtained from sources believed by The Fast Mode to be reliable, The Fast Mode is not liable for any losses or damages arising from any information limitations, changes, inaccuracies, misrepresentations, omissions or errors contained therein. The heading is for ease of reference and shall not be deemed to influence the information presented.