What is Azure Policy? Azure Policy is a service within Microsoft Azure that allows organizations to create, assign, and manage policies. These policies define rules and effects over resources, identities, and groups, in an effort to ensure compliance and uphold security. Enforcement comes in two forms – flagging non compliance so your team can remediate the concern or simply blocking deployment.
Before delving deeper into Azure Policy, let’s narrow in on what a security policy is, especially in the context of the Cloud. A security policy in cloud computing is a set of rules and guidelines that control the protection of cloud-based systems and data.
Security policies are an important part of robust cloud identity and access management (IAM). IAM policies are crucial for safeguarding data by limiting the identities with access to critical applications and assets.
To drive this point home, IBM’s 2022 Cloud Threat Landscape Report noted that identities were excessively privileged in 99% of the cloud breach cases their teams analyzed.
At the heart of Azure Policy are two core components: policies and initiatives. Policies in Azure are the specific rules or guidelines, while initiatives are collections of policies that help achieve a broader compliance goal. Let’s break down the components of policies below.
Policy Definitions: A policy definition expresses what to evaluate and what action to take. Each policy definition in Azure Policy has a set of conditions under which it’s enforced and an accompanying effect that takes place if the conditions are met.
Azure Policy Effects: What happens when the conditions are met. Some common effects include: Deny, Audit, Append, Disabled, and DeployIfNotExists
Policy Parameters: Parameters are used to provide flexibility and reduce policy definition redundancy. They allow you to reuse the policy definition for different scenarios. Think of them as fields on a form to fill out – name, city, birthdate, address, etc. They remain, but how you fill them out can change.
Policy Assignments: Assignments are the application of a policy or initiative to a specific scope (subscription, management group, etc.)
Azure Policy ensures consistent resource configuration across your environment, this is especially helpful in large scale enterprise environments with various tenants, subscriptions, and teams.
It helps in maintaining regulatory compliance by ensuring that resources and identity access adheres to corporate standards and legal regulations.
Azure policy enhances security by enforcing restrictions on resource configurations and services. Control over developer testing and deployment and general employee or machine identity privilege is critical for safeguarding your business. Unauthorized access and excessive privilege is a frequent and serious concern leading to security breach and business disruption.
Hierarchy of different Azure scopes.
Management groups in Azure Policy provide a way to manage access, policy, and compliance across multiple Azure subscriptions. They act as overarching security guardrails.
Policies can be applied to entire subscriptions, affecting all resources within.
Resource groups are another level at which policies can be applied, affecting all resources within the group.
Policies can also be targeted at specific resources, providing granular control.
As mentioned above, management groups are a mechanism to help group together Azure subscriptions. This can be a powerful tool when used correctly. Management groups allow you to manage multiple subscriptions alike, without having to implement controls at the individual subscriptions.
When building Azure policies, you can set the scope to “management group” to ensure security practices are enforced across subscriptions. For example, if you implemented role-based access control to better protect data and resources, all the subscriptions within that management group inherits the RBAC. This is a good way to build far-reaching security guardrails.
You can organize different management groups to reflect your business (regional units, teams, etc.) or deployment stages (e.g. development, testing, production.)
With many varying scopes of policy, differing inheritance processes and hierarchical structures, Azure governance can get complicated. Below, we’ll discuss challenges associated with it.
Azure Policy and Azure Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) differ significantly. While Azure Policy focuses on resource properties, RBAC concentrates on user actions. Azure Policy enforces properties at the time of resource creation or update, whereas RBAC controls what users can do with existing resources.
According to Microsoft, Azure management groups support Azure RBAC. Any role can be assigned to a group and it will inherit down the hierarchy – for e.g. a role ‘vm contributor’ assigned to a resource group will lead all virtual machines in the group to inherit the role.
The hierarchy of Azure policies adds a layer of complexity, particularly in large organizations with multiple levels of management and resources. The challenges include:
1. Visibility and Traceability: With policies set at various levels – from the tenant level down to individual services – it becomes difficult to have clear visibility into how these policies interact and what their cumulative effect is. Policies set at high levels mean resources and identities down the hierarchy inherit those policies and permissions.
2. Consistency and Conflict Resolution: Ensuring consistency of policies across different levels and resolving conflicts when overlapping policies are applied can be a difficult task if done manually.
3. Complexity in Troubleshooting: When issues arise, diagnosing and troubleshooting become more complex due to the multiple layers of policies that might be affecting a resource or a service.
Eliminate policy hierarchy complexity with Sonrai’s Toxic Permission Analyzer.
Implementing Azure policies, especially in complex environments, can be challenging. The key issues include:
1. Understanding the Scope and Impact: Administrators must thoroughly understand the scope and potential impact of a policy before implementation to avoid unintended service disruptions.
2. Aligning Policies with Business Objectives: Policies need to be aligned with business objectives and compliance requirements, which requires a deep understanding of both the organizational goals and the technical aspects of Azure services.
3. Continuous Monitoring and Adjustment: Policies are not set-and-forget. They require continuous monitoring and adjustments to adapt to changes in the cloud environment and organizational needs.
Adhering to compliance standards with Azure policies involves several challenges:
1. Keeping Up with Regulatory Changes: Compliance standards are not static. They evolve, and policies must be updated accordingly, which requires constant vigilance and adaptability, especially if done manually.
2. Mapping Compliance Requirements to Technical Controls: Translating compliance requirements into technical controls within Azure policies can be complex and requires a deep understanding of both the regulatory landscape and Azure services.
3. Proof of Compliance: Organizations often need to provide evidence of compliance, which means they must have mechanisms in place to document and report on policy adherence and effectiveness.
Some tips to keep in mind when building out policies:
Let’s consider some azure policy examples.
First, consider a policy set at the management group level only allowing specific resource types. This policy ensures that only approved types of Azure resources can be created within all the subscriptions under that management group.
For instance, an organization might want to restrict the creation of certain types of storage accounts that are not compliant with regulatory standards. By applying this policy at the management group level, the organization ensures a uniform compliance posture across all its Azure subscriptions.
Further, another azure policy example could be managing access to production vs non production workloads. You can use a management group policy to enforce that developer roles have contributor permissions in non-production environments, and read-only permissions for production environments.
Finally, let’s take a look at a specific policy set at the management group scope that is defining a custom role with the following permissions in JSON format:
{
“Name”: “MG Test Custom Role”,
“Id”: “id”,
“IsCustom”: true,
“Description”: “This role provides members with custom roles.”,
“Actions”: [
“Microsoft.Management/managementgroups/delete”,
“Microsoft.Management/managementgroups/read”,
“Microsoft.Management/managementgroup/write”,
“Microsoft.Management/managementgroup/subscriptions/delete”,
“Microsoft.Management/managementgroup/subscriptions/write”,
“Microsoft.resources/subscriptions/read”,
“Microsoft.Authorization/policyAssignments/*”,
“Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions/*”,
“Microsoft.Authorization/policySetDefinitions/*”,
“Microsoft.PolicyInsights/*”,
“Microsoft.Authorization/roleAssignments/*”,
“Microsoft.Authorization/roledefinitions/*”
],
“NotActions”: [],
“DataActions”: [],
“NotDataActions”: [],
“AssignableScopes”: [
“/providers/microsoft.management/managementGroups/ContosoCorporate”
]}
The complexity of managing multiple overlapping policies in Azure can lead to a lack of visibility and control. It’s crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the cumulative effect of these policies on your Azure environment to avoid potential challenges.
Without proper visibility, your identities might end up with access that was never intended. In the cloud, privileges can be inherited in ways that are not immediately apparent, making it difficult to track them ‘on paper.’ This type of hidden privilege can create opportunities for lateral movement within your network, which malicious attackers could exploit.
Conversely, if you implement an overly conservative strategy with strict denial through Azure Policy, you may face development disruptions and inefficient request processes.
This blog answered the question, ‘what is azure policy?’ Azure Policy is a key element of Azure’s security and governance framework. With appropriate tools and practices, managing Azure policies can become an efficient and integral part of your cloud security strategy.
Implementing and managing Azure policies can be complex, but tools like Sonrai’s cloud infrastructure entitlement management solution can make this process more manageable. Sonrai’s patented permission analytics consider every type of policy – Azure AD group policy, resource group policies, management group policies, and more. This provides your teams with a clear view of the effective privileges of every identity in your environment and better management over resources.
This insight, combined with continuous monitoring of permission and access changes, helps alert teams to any potential identity risks, such as unintended privileges or attack paths to sensitive data.
Discover Sonrai’s CIEM solution here. Or explore how Sonrai secures Azure environments
What are the main differences between Azure roles and Azure policies?
Azure roles focus on user actions and permissions, while Azure policies enforce rules on resource properties and configurations.
How does Azure Policy enhance compliance within cloud environments?
Azure Policy ensures that resources comply with corporate standards and regulatory requirements, thereby enhancing compliance.
How does Azure Policy compare to other similar cloud compliance services?
Azure Policy is integrated within the Azure ecosystem, providing seamless governance and compliance capabilities compared to other cloud services.
Can Azure Policy be applied across multiple subscriptions and management groups?
Yes, Azure Policy can be applied across multiple subscriptions and management groups, allowing for broad governance and compliance enforcement.
*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Sonrai | Enterprise Cloud Security Platform authored by Tally Shea. Read the original post at: https://sonraisecurity.com/blog/what-is-azure-policy-all-you-need-to-know/