Cache Deception: When “Harmless Caching” Becomes a Real Risk
嗯,用户让我总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要特定的开头。首先,我得仔细阅读这篇文章,理解它的主要内容。 文章是关于Cache Deception的,这是一种漏洞。作者Nitin Yadav解释了当缓存层被欺骗时,会缓存敏感的用户数据,并错误地提供给其他用户。这种情况通常发生在缓存层根据URL而不是后端逻辑来决定缓存内容的时候。后端虽然提供了认证内容,但缓存却将其当作静态文件存储了。 我需要把这些关键点浓缩到100字以内。重点包括:Cache Deception是什么,它是如何发生的,以及它的影响。可能还需要提到作者的写作风格,比如实用且直接。 然后,我要确保语言简洁明了,不使用复杂的术语,同时涵盖所有重要信息。比如,可以提到作者通过实际案例解释了这种漏洞的工作原理和潜在风险。 最后,检查字数是否符合要求,并确保内容准确传达文章的核心信息。 </think> 文章介绍了Cache Deception这一漏洞类型,解释了其工作原理及潜在风险。作者通过实际案例说明当缓存层被欺骗时会将敏感用户数据错误地提供给其他用户,并强调了其对隐私安全的影响。 2026-1-25 14:15:26 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:1 收藏

Nitin yadav

Hello everyone, I’m Nitin Yadav. Back again with another practical blog.

This time we’re talking about Cache Deception – a bug class that looks simple, but when it works, it can leak private user data across users.

No fluff. No theory dump.
I’ll explain what it is, why it matters, and how to think about it as a bug hunter. We’ll go step by step, one topic at a time.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

What is Cache Deception?

Cache Deception happens when a caching layer (CDN / reverse proxy) is tricked into caching sensitive, user-specific responses and then serving them to other users.

Normally:

  • Static files (.css, .js, .jpg) → cached
  • Dynamic endpoints (/profile, /account, /api/me) → not cached

But sometimes:

  • The cache decides based on the URL, not the backend logic
  • The backend still serves authenticated content
  • The cache stores it as if it were static

That’s the mistake we exploit.

Cache Deception is when private, authenticated content gets cached and becomes accessible to other users due to URL manipulation.


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/cache-deception-when-harmless-caching-becomes-a-real-risk-2920b0a2f3db?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh