Cache Deception: When “Harmless Caching” Becomes a Real Risk
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在100个字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头。首先,我需要仔细阅读文章内容,抓住主要观点。 文章讲的是Cache Deception,这是一种安全漏洞。作者Nitin Yadav解释了当缓存层被欺骗时,会缓存敏感的用户特定响应,并将其提供给其他用户。正常情况下,静态文件会被缓存,动态端点不会。但有时候,缓存层只根据URL来决定是否缓存,而不管后端逻辑。结果导致私人、认证的内容被缓存并被其他用户访问。 所以,总结的时候要包括Cache Deception的定义、发生的原因以及影响。控制在100字以内的话,可能需要简洁地表达这些点。 另外,用户可能是一位安全研究人员或者开发者,对漏洞感兴趣。他们可能想快速了解这个概念而不深入阅读整篇文章。因此,总结需要准确且简明。 最后,确保语言流畅自然,避免使用技术术语过多,让读者容易理解。 </think> Cache Deception是一种安全漏洞,指缓存层被欺骗将敏感的用户特定内容(如认证数据)误认为静态资源进行缓存,并可能泄露给其他用户。 2026-1-25 14:15:26 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:1 收藏

Nitin yadav

Hello everyone, I’m Nitin Yadav. Back again with another practical blog.

This time we’re talking about Cache Deception – a bug class that looks simple, but when it works, it can leak private user data across users.

No fluff. No theory dump.
I’ll explain what it is, why it matters, and how to think about it as a bug hunter. We’ll go step by step, one topic at a time.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

What is Cache Deception?

Cache Deception happens when a caching layer (CDN / reverse proxy) is tricked into caching sensitive, user-specific responses and then serving them to other users.

Normally:

  • Static files (.css, .js, .jpg) → cached
  • Dynamic endpoints (/profile, /account, /api/me) → not cached

But sometimes:

  • The cache decides based on the URL, not the backend logic
  • The backend still serves authenticated content
  • The cache stores it as if it were static

That’s the mistake we exploit.

Cache Deception is when private, authenticated content gets cached and becomes accessible to other users due to URL manipulation.


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/cache-deception-when-harmless-caching-becomes-a-real-risk-2920b0a2f3db?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d--bug_bounty
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh