The "Discovery" requirement
嗯,用户让我总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在一百个字以内。首先,我需要仔细阅读文章,理解其主要观点。文章讨论的是在法医图像分析中,是否有必要记录分析师执行的操作和查询。作者特别指出,这不涉及获取阶段,而是分析、处理和后获取阶段。 接下来,作者举了一个例子,使用SQLite查询msgstore.db来查找关键词或特定时间线。然后他询问是否需要记录这些查询,并且是否应该在应用层面或由分析师手动记录。作者假设答案是肯定的,但不确定是否适用于所有情况。 所以,总结的时候要涵盖:法医图像分析中的操作日志记录必要性、包括查询和文件访问、以及记录方式的探讨。还要注意用词简洁,控制在一百字以内。 可能会遇到的问题是如何准确传达所有关键点而不超字数限制。可能需要简化某些部分,比如将“法医图像”直接称为“ forensic image”,或者用更简洁的表达方式。 最后,确保总结直接描述内容,不需要开头语句如“这篇文章讨论了...”。 </think> 文章探讨了在法医图像分析中记录分析师操作和查询的必要性,包括对数据库的查询和文件访问,并讨论了记录方式及适用范围。 2026-1-25 08:36:40 Author: www.reddit.com(查看原文) 阅读量:3 收藏

Is it "absolutely" necessary we have logs of what actions/queries we as an analyst do on a forensic image? Is this a requirement for maintaining transparency or reproducibility?

Note that I am not talking about acquisition part but purely analysis/processing/post-acquisition part.

For e.g., let's say you are operating on an android device image. You queried msgstore.db through SQLite syntax to look for certain keyword occurence or to filter within specific timeline. Is it necessary or suggested that you should have log of that query? Same goes if you accessed any other files, doesn't matter if it's worth of investigation or not. If the answer is yes, should this be done at application level or analyst is manually supposed to do this?

I am assuming the answer is mostly yes but does it mean you do this for all cases or only when there is requirement for so?


文章来源: https://www.reddit.com/r/computerforensics/comments/1qmdsms/the_discovery_requirement/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh